Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.931.7
Basic Information
NokiaKyocera
--2011-07-25
3.63 x 1.90 x 0.81 inches4.00 x 2.10 x 1.00 inches
3.67 ounces5.10 ounces
$ 155.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
STNTFT
93 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.16.1
Performance
--Qualcomm QSC6085 chipset
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
5,12 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.21.32
Camera
0.30 MP3.20 MP
220 x 176 video resolution--
3.635.06
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
700mAh Li-Ion Battery1360mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
263 hours standby time
3.2 hours talk time
8.1 hours talk time
2.083.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

Kyocera DuraMax has an overall score of 31.7, which is slightly better than Nokia 5200's score of 29.9. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Kyocera DuraMax construction is somewhat thicker and way heavier than Nokia 5200. Kyocera DuraMax counts with a CPU that is very similar to the Nokia 5200 one, both have a 0-Core CPU.

Kyocera DuraMax features a better looking screen than Nokia 5200, because it has much more pixels per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 320 x 240. The Kyocera DuraMax features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia 5200. The Kyocera DuraMax counts with a much longer battery duration than Nokia 5200, because it has 1360mAh of battery capacity instead of 700mAh.

Kyocera DuraMax has a lot better camera than Nokia 5200, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.

Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Kyocera DuraMax is also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.