Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 3.63 x 1.90 x 0.81 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.67 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.8 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| STN | Super AMOLED |
| 93 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 5,12 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 263 hours standby time 3.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is much better than the Nokia 5200, having a general score of 83.3 against 29.9. The Samsung Galaxy S9 construction is noticeably heavier but notably thinner than the Nokia 5200. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia 5200, because it has a way higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 5200, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S9 features a much better performing processor than Nokia 5200, because it has a greater number of cores. The Galaxy S9 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Nokia 5200, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 700mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Nokia 5200, because it has a way better (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a way better 12 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more than Nokia 5200, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.