Search


Compare phones

Sharp FX
Global Score
29.931.7
Basic Information
NokiaSharp
--2010-07-19
3.63 x 1.90 x 0.81 inches4.20 x 2.20 x 0.60 inches
3.67 ounces5.00 ounces
$ 155.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
--3 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
STNTFT
93 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenYes
5.15.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
5,12 MB internal memory81,92 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.21.82
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
220 x 176 video resolution--
3.634.73
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.9
Battery Life
700mAh Li-Ion Battery1240mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
263 hours standby time
3.2 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.082.96
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1
--GPS
Infra-red port--
--Digital TV Broadcast

Comparison review

Sharp FX is slightly better than Nokia 5200, having a global score of 31.7 against 29.9. The Sharp FX body is extremely heavier but a lot thinner than the Nokia 5200. The Sharp FX's CPU is very similar to the Nokia 5200 one, both have 0 cores. The Sharp FX has a more vivid screen than Nokia 5200, because it has a way better 400 x 240 resolution and a much better pixel quantity per inch in the display.

The Sharp FX has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 5200, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Sharp FX counts with a way better battery lifetime than Nokia 5200, because it has a 77 percent bigger battery capacity. The Sharp FX captures greater photos and videos than Nokia 5200, because it has a much more MP camera in the back.

Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Sharp FX is also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.