Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.535
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
--2014-04-09
3.63 x 1.89 x 0.81 inches4.88 x 2.19 x 0.41 inches
3.75 ounces3.52 ounces
--Black, Green, Red, White and Yellow
$ 269.00$ 225.00
Display / Screen
--2.8 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
222 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.55.8
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
7,17 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.21.32
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--33.80mm focal length
--0.2 inches (1/5") sensor
220 x 176 video resolution320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
4.515.72
EDGE and GSMEDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM, Dual SIM
0.30.4
Battery Life
760mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
216 hours standby time
3.2 hours talk time
864 hours standby time
21 hours talk time
2.162.88
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 3.0
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

The Nokia 225 has an overall score of 35, which is a bit better than the Nokia 5300 XpressMusic's general score of 32.5. The Nokia 225 construction is way thinner and just a little lighter than Nokia 5300 XpressMusic. The Nokia 225's processing unit is very similar to Nokia 5300 XpressMusic's processing unit, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit.

The Nokia 5300 XpressMusic counts with a sharper display than Nokia 225, and although they both have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240, the Nokia 5300 XpressMusic also has a much higher screen pixels density. Nokia 225 counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 5300 XpressMusic.

Nokia 225 has a much longer battery duration than Nokia 5300 XpressMusic, because it has a 1200mAh battery capacity. Nokia 225 counts with a very superior camera than Nokia 5300 XpressMusic, because it has a way better 320x240 (QVGA) video resolution and a way more MP camera in the back.

The Nokia 225 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.