Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2017-01-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 8937 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a lot better than Nokia 6's overall score of 66.5. The Galaxy A50 is a newer cellphone, and it is also a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Nokia 6. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better performance than Nokia 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A50 also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Nokia 6 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A50, although it has a little smaller screen, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little bit worse display pixels density. Galaxy A50 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Nokia 6, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a much more megapixels camera and a bigger aperture for better photos in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Nokia 6, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A50 has improved battery life than Nokia 6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.