Search


Compare phones

Motorola W175

W175, W175g, W180
Global Score
48.928.6
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
Symbian Belle--
2011-08-242007-10-11
4.37 x 2.09 x 0.56 inches4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches
3.53 ounces2.99 ounces
Black, Green, Pink and White--
$ 40.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
3.2 inches--
360 x 640 pixels 128 x 128 pixels
TFTSTN
229 pixels per inch101 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.55.2
ARM11 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor processor
512 MB RAM--
Yes GPU GPU
7.385.76
Storage
2 GB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
3.220
Camera
5.00 MP--
1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution--
6.270
Networks
Wi-Fi--
HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, GPRS and GSMGSM
SIMSIM
3.30.1
Battery Life
1200mAh Li-Ion Battery940mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
540 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
465 hours standby time
9.8 hours talk time
2.882.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0--
GPS--
NFC--
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor--
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia 600 has a score of 48.9, which is way better than Motorola W175's 28.6 score. Nokia 600's body is incredibly newer, but heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola W175. The Nokia 600 has a much better display than Motorola W175, because it has much more pixels per inch of display and a much better resolution of 640 x 360 pixels.

The Nokia 600 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola W175, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 32 GB. The Nokia 600 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola W175, because it has 1 more processing cores. The Nokia 600 features greater battery lifetime than Motorola W175, because it has 1200mAh of battery capacity instead of 940mAh.

The Nokia 600 has a lot better camera than Motorola W175.

Nokia 600 and the Motorola W175 cost the same, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.