Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.2 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| 2005-03-01 | 2005-06-03 |
| 4.17 x 1.73 x 0.79 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 3.10 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 279.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 3,58 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| EDGE and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 320 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 has a global score of 26, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 6021's 24.2 overall score. Although the Nokia 1600 and the Nokia 6021 were only released with a couple of months difference, the Nokia 1600 is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter. Nokia 1600 has a way better looking display than Nokia 6021, although it has a much lower resolution of 68 x 96.
The Nokia 1600 and Nokia 6021 both have very similar processors, they have 0 cores. The Nokia 6021 counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia 1600. Nokia 1600 counts with a camera that's very similar to Nokia 6021's camera. Nokia 1600's battery performance is very similar to Nokia 6021's battery duration.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia 1600 is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.