Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.3 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2005-03-01 | 2008-01-07 |
| 4.09 x 1.73 x 0.71 inches | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| 3.17 ounces | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 145.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 4,1 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.48 |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W270 is just a bit better than Nokia 6030, with a score of 25.6 against 24.3. The Motorola W270 construction is way newer and thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Nokia 6030. Motorola W270 features a display that's just as good as Nokia 6030's display, both of them have the same 128 x 128 pixels resolution.
Motorola W270 and Nokia 6030 count with very similar processors, both have the same number of cores. The Motorola W270 features a camera that's very similar to the camera in Nokia 6030. The Nokia 6030 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola W270, although it has no SD memory card expansion slot.
The Motorola W270 features just a little better battery performance than Nokia 6030, because it has a 4% bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola W270 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.