Compare phones
Nokia 6070
6070
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 31 | 34.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2006-02-13 | 2009-02-16 |
| 4.15 x 1.75 x 0.73 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.73 inches |
| 3.10 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 269.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| CSTN | TFT |
| 114 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | GPU |
| 5.94 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 3,28 MB internal memory | 9,22 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.24 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung E2210 has an overall score of 34.1, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 6070's score of 31. Samsung E2210 is a just a little lighter cellphone than the Nokia 6070, but both have the same thickness. Nokia 6070 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung E2210, and although they both have 0 cores, the Nokia 6070 also has a graphics co-processor.
Samsung E2210 features a bit sharper display than Nokia 6070. Both have the same exact resolution of 160 x 128, the same pixel density and a display with the same size. Nokia 6070 and Samsung E2210 have extremely similar cameras, they have a back-facing camera with a 0.3 mega-pixels resolution. The Samsung E2210 counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Nokia 6070, because it has 9,22 MB internal storage capacity.
Samsung E2210 features a much better battery lifetime than Nokia 6070.
The Samsung E2210 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.