Search


Compare phones

LG Vu

CU920, CU915
Global Score
33.336.5
Basic Information
NokiaLG
2006-11-282008-04-01
4.14 x 1.74 x 0.73 inches4.25 x 2.16 x 0.51 inches
2.96 ounces3.16 ounces
$ 139.00$ 120.00
Display / Screen
--3 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
STNTFT
137 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.75.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
5,12 MB internal memory122,88 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.20.6
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
--320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution
3.634.84
Networks
Wi-Fi--
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
2.70.9
Battery Life
970mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.562.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 1.2
--Digital TV Broadcast

Comparison review

The LG Vu is a bit better than Nokia 6086, getting a 36.5 score against 33.3. Even though LG Vu is just a little bit heavier than Nokia 6086, it's thinner and also newer. LG Vu's CPU is very similar to Nokia 6086's CPU, both have the same number of cores. The LG Vu counts with a little bit better screen than Nokia 6086, because it has a lot better 400 x 240px resolution and a quite greater display density.

LG Vu has a very superior camera than Nokia 6086, because it has a way higher resolution back facing camera. LG Vu counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 6086, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 117,76 MB more internal storage.

The LG Vu's battery life is just as good as the Nokia 6086 one, although the LG Vu also has a 3 percent more battery capacity.

LG Vu not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest, making it easy to pick between these devices.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.