Search


Compare phones

Samsung Chrono

SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A
Global Score
33.336.1
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2006-11-280000-00-00
4.14 x 1.74 x 0.73 inches3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches
2.96 ounces3.14 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 139.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
STNTFT
137 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.76.3
processor processor
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.765.94
Storage
5,12 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.20
Camera
0.30 MP0.30 MP
3.633.63
Networks
Wi-Fi--
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
2.70.1
Battery Life
970mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
526 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.562.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

The Samsung Chrono has a general score of 36.1, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 6086's general score of 33.3. The Samsung Chrono is a just a little heavier but a little thinner cellphone than Nokia 6086. Samsung Chrono counts with a brighter display than Nokia 6086, because it has a higher screen density and a lot better 320 x 240 resolution.

Nokia 6086 has a much better memory for applications and games than Samsung Chrono. The Samsung Chrono features a bit faster processing unit than Nokia 6086, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Chrono also has a GPU. Samsung Chrono's camera is just as good as Nokia 6086's camera, they have a same resolution camera.

Nokia 6086 counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Chrono, because it has a 21% more battery capacity.

In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Chrono is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.