Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2002-11-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.02 x 1.73 x 0.68 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 2.68 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.5 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| -- | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 0 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is way better than Nokia 6100, getting an 80 score against 24.1. Even though Google Pixel 3 is notably heavier than the Nokia 6100, it's a lot thinner and also notably newer. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much sharper display than Nokia 6100, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels.
Google Pixel 3 has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 6100. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much greater performance than Nokia 6100, because it has a higher number of cores. The Google Pixel 3 has a superior battery life than Nokia 6100, because it has a 305% bigger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a greater camera than Nokia 6100.
Google Pixel 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Nokia 6100.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.