Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2002-11-06 | 2008-01-07 |
| 4.02 x 1.73 x 0.68 inches | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| 2.68 ounces | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 165.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.48 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W270 has an overall score of 25.6, which is a bit better than Nokia 6100's general score of 24.1. Even though Motorola W270 is somewhat heavier than the Nokia 6100, it's somewhat thinner and also notably newer. Motorola W270 features a little sharper display than Nokia 6100. Both of them have the same exact 128 x 128 resolution.
The Motorola W270 features as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Nokia 6100. The Nokia 6100 and the Motorola W270 both feature extremely similar CPUs, they have a 0-Core processing unit. Motorola W270 features improved battery performance than Nokia 6100, because it has 940mAh of battery capacity instead of 720mAh.
The Motorola W270 features a camera that's just as good as the Nokia 6100 one.
The Motorola W270 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.