Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| 2002-11-06 | 2005-06-03 |
| 4.02 x 1.73 x 0.68 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 2.68 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 165.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.4 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 has a score of 26, which is just a bit better than Nokia 6100's 24.1 general score. Even though the Nokia 1600 is heavier than Nokia 6100, it's a little bit thinner and also way newer. Nokia 6100 and Nokia 1600 have similar processing units, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 1600 has a much sharper screen than Nokia 6100, although it has a much lower resolution of 68 x 96px.
The Nokia 1600 and Nokia 6100 count with extremely similar cameras. Nokia 6100 and Nokia 1600 both count with quite similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos. Nokia 1600 features better battery life than Nokia 6100, because it has a 900mAh battery size instead of 720mAh.
Nokia 1600 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.