Compare phones
Kyocera Marbl
K132| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Kyocera |
| 2002-11-18 | 2006-09-13 |
| 4.17 x 1.77 x 0.75 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 3.20 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 522,24 KB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.4 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Kyocera Marbl is just a bit better than the Nokia 6200, having a 24.5 score against 24.1. The Kyocera Marbl body is notably newer than the Nokia 6200's, although it is a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Kyocera Marbl features an incredibly better screen than Nokia 6200. Both of them have an equal resolution of 128 x 128px.
Nokia 6200 has much more storage for apps and games than Kyocera Marbl. The Kyocera Marbl's processor is very similar to the Nokia 6200 one, they have a 0-Core processor. The Nokia 6200 and the Kyocera Marbl count with quite similar cameras. Kyocera Marbl counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Nokia 6200, because it has a 900mAh battery capacity.
Kyocera Marbl not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.