Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2002-11-18 | 2008-01-07 |
| 4.17 x 1.77 x 0.75 inches | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| 3.20 ounces | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 522,24 KB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| EDGE and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.48 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W270 has an overall score of 25.6, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 6200's 24.1 score. The Motorola W270 construction is much newer and way thinner than the Nokia 6200's, although it is also a little bit heavier. Nokia 6200 and Motorola W270 count with really similar processing units, both have the same number of cores.
Motorola W270 features a bit better display than Nokia 6200. Both of them have the same resolution of 128 x 128 pixels. The Motorola W270 features a camera that is very similar to the Nokia 6200 one. The Nokia 6200 counts with much more storage for applications and games than Motorola W270, although it has no slot for external memory cards.
Motorola W270 features improved battery performance than Nokia 6200, because it has 940mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Motorola W270 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.