Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2002-11-18 | 2006-04-04 |
| 4.17 x 1.77 x 0.75 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.20 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 75.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 522,24 KB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.32 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W315 is just a bit better than the Nokia 6200, having a 24.7 score against 24.1. Motorola W315's body is notably newer and a little lighter than Nokia 6200's, but it is also a little thicker. Motorola W315 features a little more vivid screen than Nokia 6200, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 160 x 128.
The Motorola W315's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Nokia 6200, both have a 0-Core CPU. Nokia 6200 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola W315. Motorola W315 and Nokia 6200 both feature very similar cameras. The Motorola W315 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Nokia 6200, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola W315 is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.