Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| 2002-11-18 | 2005-06-03 |
| 4.17 x 1.77 x 0.75 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 3.20 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 522,24 KB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| EDGE and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.4 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 is a bit better than Nokia 6200, having a 26 score against 24.1. Nokia 1600's construction is notably newer, just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Nokia 6200. Nokia 1600 has a way better display than Nokia 6200, although it has a way worse resolution of 68 x 96. Nokia 1600's CPU is just as good as the Nokia 6200 one, both of them have 0 cpu cores.
The Nokia 6200 and the Nokia 1600 feature quite similar cameras. Nokia 6200 has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Nokia 1600. The Nokia 1600 counts with just a little better battery performance than Nokia 6200, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity against 780mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Nokia 1600 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.