Global Score | |
27.3 | 30 |
Basic Information | |
Nokia | Nokia |
-- | Windows Phone |
2003-03-11 | 0000-00-00 |
4.21 x 1.77 x 0.75 inches | -- |
3.25 ounces | -- |
$ 429.00 | $ 149.00 |
128 x 128 pixels | -- |
LCD | -- |
-- | 143 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
2.8 | 5.8 |
processor | processor |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
4,1 MB internal memory | -- |
No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
0.2 | 0 |
Camera | |
0.10 MP | -- |
3.08 | 0 |
Networks | |
-- | Wi-Fi |
EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
0.3 | 3.5 |
Battery Life | |
720mAh Li-Ion Battery | -- |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
192 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | -- |
2.08 | 1.36 |
Other Features | |
-- | Bluetooth |
-- | GPS |
Infra-red port | -- |
-- | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
FM Radio | -- |
The Nokia W8 is just a bit better than the Nokia 6220, with a 30 score against 27.3. Nokia W8 is a a lot lighter and notably thinner phone than Nokia 6220. The Nokia W8 has a processing unit that is very similar to Nokia 6220's processing unit, they have 0 processing cores. Nokia W8 has an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia 6220.
The Nokia 6220 has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Nokia W8. The Nokia 6220 features a superior battery life than Nokia W8. Nokia 6220 has a very superior camera than Nokia W8.
The Nokia W8 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.