Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2003-03-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 4.21 x 1.77 x 0.75 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.25 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6.7 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4,1 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 0.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.08 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 192 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is way better than the Nokia 6220, with a global score of 87.5 against 27.3. The Samsung Galaxy A71 construction is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner, but notably heavier than Nokia 6220. Galaxy A71 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Nokia 6220, because it has more processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 6220, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A71 takes much better photographs and videos than Nokia 6220, because it has a way higher resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy A71 has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 6220, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a very superior battery life than Nokia 6220, because it has a 525 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.