Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2003-03-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 4.21 x 1.77 x 0.75 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.25 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4,1 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 0.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.08 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 192 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is way better than the Nokia 6220, getting an 86.3 score against 27.3. Samsung Galaxy S10e's construction is noticeably newer and much thinner than Nokia 6220's, but it is also way heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much greater hardware performance than Nokia 6220, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a lot better screen than Nokia 6220, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2280px resolution. Galaxy S10e has a lot better camera than Nokia 6220, because it has a back camera with a way higher resolution. The Galaxy S10e has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Nokia 6220, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S10e features a way better battery lifetime than Nokia 6220, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10e is also cheaper than the Nokia 6220, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.