Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2003-03-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 4.21 x 1.77 x 0.75 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 3.25 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6.3 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4,1 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 0.10 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.08 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 192 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is way better than Nokia 6220's 27.3 overall score. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is notably newer and way thinner, but extremely heavier than Nokia 6220. Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better display than Nokia 6220, because it has a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a much greater performance than Nokia 6220, because it has more processing cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Nokia 6220, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal storage.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better camera than Nokia 6220, because it has a much higher resolution back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a superior battery performance than Nokia 6220, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Nokia 6220, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.