Compare phones
LG A175
A175| Global Score | |
| 27.2 | 28.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| 2003-09-12 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.83 inches | 3.54 x 1.82 x 0.75 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 2.67 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.5 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| -- | 121 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5.5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.94 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| CDMA | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 2.4 hours talk time | 720 hours standby time 13 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.48 |
| GPS | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG A175 has an overall score of 28.9, which is a bit better than Nokia 6225's global score of 27.2. The LG A175 body is incredibly lighter and a little thinner than the Nokia 6225. The LG A175 features a way better looking screen than Nokia 6225. Both of them have the same 128 x 128 pixels resolution.
The LG A175's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as Nokia 6225's one. LG A175 features a bit better processing power than Nokia 6225, and although they both have 0 processing cores, the LG A175 also has an extra GPU. LG A175 counts with superior battery life than Nokia 6225, because it has a 22% bigger battery capacity.
Nokia 6225 shoots much better photographs and videos than LG A175.
The LG A175 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.