Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 27.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2003-09-12 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.83 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.2 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| -- | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 2.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 2.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.24 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a lot better than Nokia 6225, with a 76.4 score against 27.2. The Motorola DROID Turbo construction is a lot newer and much thinner, but also a lot heavier than Nokia 6225. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a really superior hardware performance than Nokia 6225, because it has a graphics processor and a higher number of faster cores.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much sharper screen than Nokia 6225, because it has a much higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a lot better camera than Nokia 6225, because it has a back camera with way more MP. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 6225.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a really longer battery duration than Nokia 6225, because it has a 400 percent greater battery capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.