Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2003-09-12 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.83 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 2.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is much better than the Nokia 6225's general score of 27.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S9 is extremely heavier than Nokia 6225, it's thinner and also incredibly newer. Galaxy S9 has a lot better hardware performance than Nokia 6225, because it has 8 more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a way better looking display than Nokia 6225, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2960px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a very superior camera than Nokia 6225, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP. The Galaxy S9 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 6225, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior battery duration than Nokia 6225, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Nokia 6225.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.