Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.2 | 29.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Sony |
| 2003-09-12 | 2005-03-01 |
| 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.83 inches | 3.93 x 1.78 x 0.76 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 159.00 | $ 115.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 12,29 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 670mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 2.4 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2 |
| GPS | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Ericsson K300 has a score of 29.3, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 6225's overall score of 27.2. The Sony Ericsson K300 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Nokia 6225. The Sony Ericsson K300 counts with a little bit better display than Nokia 6225. Both of them have an equal 128 x 128 resolution.
The Sony Ericsson K300 counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the Nokia 6225 one, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit. The Sony Ericsson K300 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia 6225. The Sony Ericsson K300 and Nokia 6225 both feature quite similar cameras, both have a back facing camera with a 0.3 mega-pixels resolution.
Nokia 6225 has superior battery life than Sony Ericsson K300, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Sony Ericsson K300 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.