Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.2 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Sony |
| -- | 2007-02-06 |
| 4.15 x 1.67 x 0.71 inches | 4.05 x 1.81 x 0.65 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| -- | 57 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 10,24 MB internal memory | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1070mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 288 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.4 |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Ericsson K200 is much better than Nokia 6236i, with a general score of 31.7 against 28.2. The Sony Ericsson K200 construction is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Nokia 6236i. The Sony Ericsson K200 and Nokia 6236i count with really similar processors, they have a 0-Core processing unit.
The Sony Ericsson K200 has a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 6236i. They have the same exact 128 x 128 resolution. Nokia 6236i and Sony Ericsson K200 feature extremely similar cameras, both of them have a camera with a 0.3 megapixels resolution. Nokia 6236i has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Sony Ericsson K200, because it has 10,24 MB internal storage.
The Nokia 6236i has improved battery life than Sony Ericsson K200, because it has 1070mAh of battery capacity.
The Sony Ericsson K200 and the Nokia 6236i cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.