Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 7.0s | -- |
| 2004-06-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.01 x 1.92 x 0.91 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.58 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.5 inches |
| 176 x 208 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| -- | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 6,14 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| RS-MMC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.52 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 760mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 144 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.16 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is way better than Nokia 6260, getting a general score of 80 against 27.8. The Google Pixel 3 body is a lot newer and noticeably thinner, but somewhat heavier than Nokia 6260. The Google Pixel 3 has a much more vibrant display than Nokia 6260, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160.
The Google Pixel 3 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 6260, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 63,99 GB more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 has an extremely better processor than Nokia 6260, because it has a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 has a way better battery performance than Nokia 6260, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity against 760mAh. Google Pixel 3 shoots way better photos and videos than Nokia 6260, because it has a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Google Pixel 3 costs a little more money than Nokia 6260, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.