Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.8 | 29.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| Symbian 7.0s | -- |
| 2004-06-14 | 2006-02-13 |
| 4.01 x 1.92 x 0.91 inches | 3.62 x 1.88 x 0.78 inches |
| 4.58 ounces | 3.95 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 140.00 |
| 176 x 208 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 6,14 MB internal memory | 11,26 MB internal memory |
| RS-MMC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 1.52 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 1.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.51 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 760mAh Li-Ion Battery | 820mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 144 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6131 is slightly better than the Nokia 6260, getting a score of 29.3 against 27.8. The Nokia 6131 is a newer phone, and it's also thinner and lighter than Nokia 6260. The Nokia 6131 counts with a sharper screen than Nokia 6260, because it has a way higher resolution of 320 x 240px. The Nokia 6131 and Nokia 6260 both feature extremely similar processors, both of them have 0 CPU cores.
The Nokia 6131 has a much better camera than Nokia 6260, because it has a way higher 1.3 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Nokia 6260 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 6131, although it has just 6,14 MB internal storage capacity. Nokia 6131 features a bit superior battery performance than Nokia 6260, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
The Nokia 6131 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.