Search


Compare phones

Samsung Chrono

SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A
Global Score
3336.1
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2005-06-130000-00-00
3.94 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches
3.70 ounces3.14 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 220.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
222 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.56.3
processor processor
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.765.94
Storage
6,14 MB internal memory--
miniSD external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.20
Camera
2.00 MP0.30 MP
4.733.63
UMTS, EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.40.1
Battery Life
970mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
526 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.562.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

Samsung Chrono is a little bit better than Nokia 6280, with a score of 36.1 against 33. Samsung Chrono is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter phone than Nokia 6280. The Samsung Chrono counts with a bit superior processing unit than Nokia 6280, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Chrono also has an additional graphics processing unit.

The Nokia 6280 counts with a bit better display than Samsung Chrono, and although they both have the same resolution of 320 x 240px, the Nokia 6280 also has a just a bit greater pixels density. Nokia 6280 has a very superior camera than Samsung Chrono, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.

The Nokia 6280 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Chrono. The Nokia 6280 has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Chrono, because it has a 970mAh battery size.

Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Chrono is also a bargain compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.