Compare phones
Samsung Chrono
SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A| Global Score | |
| 33 | 36.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2006-09-20 | 0000-00-00 |
| 3.93 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches |
| 4.05 ounces | 3.14 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 222 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.94 |
| Storage | |
| 6,14 MB internal memory | -- |
| miniSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.73 | 3.63 |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 280 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 526 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Chrono has an overall score of 36.1, which is a little bit better than Nokia 6288's general score of 33. The Samsung Chrono is a incredibly lighter and thinner phone than Nokia 6288. The Nokia 6288 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Chrono, and although they both have exactly the same 320 x 240 resolution, the Nokia 6288 also has a just a bit better quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The Nokia 6288 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Chrono. The Samsung Chrono features a little better processing power than Nokia 6288, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Chrono also has an additional graphics processing unit.
Nokia 6288 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Chrono, because it has a 38% larger battery capacity. The Nokia 6288 features a lot better camera than Samsung Chrono, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Chrono is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.