Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 34.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.18 x 1.71 x 0.46 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.20 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 201.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 200 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 9,22 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 348 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a lot better than the Nokia 6300's 34.1 global score. Galaxy A50's body is a lot thinner but incredibly heavier than the Nokia 6300. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a way better processing power than Nokia 6300, because it has a larger number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much more vibrant display than Nokia 6300, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a much bigger screen and much more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A50 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 6300, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A50 counts with a superior battery life than Nokia 6300, because it has a 365% bigger battery size. The Galaxy A50 captures a lot better photos and videos than Nokia 6300, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A50 is a little more expensive than the Nokia 6300, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.