Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2009-01-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.28 x 1.82 x 0.46 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.39 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 175.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 17,41 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 4 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.86 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.61 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 450 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is way better than Nokia 6303 classic's 35.7 overall score. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a noticeably newer and a lot thinner device than Nokia 6303 classic, but it's also heavier. The Google Pixel 3a XL features a much better looking screen than Nokia 6303 classic, because it has much more pixels per display inch, a way larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a way better hardware performance than Nokia 6303 classic, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 8 more CPU cores. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Nokia 6303 classic, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3a XL shoots way better photographs and videos than Nokia 6303 classic, because it has a way better resolution back facing camera and a way better video definition. The Google Pixel 3a XL features a much longer battery lifetime than Nokia 6303 classic, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 1050mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.