Compare phones
Nokia 6350
6350Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 35.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2009-10-01 | 2013-09-04 |
| 3.67 x 1.86 x 0.68 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.62 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 200 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 30,72 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.28 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 0.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 432 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is way better than the Nokia 6350, having a global score of 80.7 against 35.1. Galaxy Note 3's body is extremely newer and way thinner than Nokia 6350's, but it's also heavier. The Galaxy Note 3 has a way better display than Nokia 6350, because it has a way better 1920 x 1080px resolution, a much higher pixel density and a lot bigger display.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a much better storage for games and applications than Nokia 6350, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better performance than Nokia 6350, because it has an extra GPU and a greater number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Nokia 6350, because it has a 3200mAh battery size instead of 1050mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Nokia 6350, because it has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper than the Nokia 6350.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.