Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.637.4
Basic Information
NokiaHP
--Windows Mobile Professional 6.5
2007-05-312009-11-24
3.79 x 1.83 x 0.64 inches4.44 x 2.47 x 0.53 inches
4.33 ounces4.66 ounces
$ 105.00$ 89.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.5 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTAMOLED
182 pixels per inch160 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
6.46
processor Single-Core 533 MHz processor
--256 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
Storage
20,48 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.30
Camera
3.20 MP3.00 MP
640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution--
5.615.06
Networks
--Wi-Fi
UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.43.3
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1590mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
320 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
423 hours standby time
5.8 hours talk time
2.43.44
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
Light SensorLight Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The HP iPAQ Glisten is a little bit better than Nokia 6500 slide, having a 37.4 score against 34.6. The HP iPAQ Glisten body is a lot newer and thinner than the Nokia 6500 slide's, although it's also a little heavier. HP iPAQ Glisten has a superior hardware performance than Nokia 6500 slide, because it has a greater number of cores.

Nokia 6500 slide has a bit sharper screen than HP iPAQ Glisten, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 320 x 240px resolution, the Nokia 6500 slide also counts with a bit better pixel density. The Nokia 6500 slide counts with a superior camera than HP iPAQ Glisten, because it has a back-facing camera with more mega pixels.

Nokia 6500 slide has a much greater memory for applications and games than HP iPAQ Glisten, although it has no external SD slot. The HP iPAQ Glisten features a superior battery life than Nokia 6500 slide, because it has 1590mAh of battery capacity against 900mAh.

The HP iPAQ Glisten not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.