Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 34.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2008-04-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 190 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 15,36 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than Nokia 6600 fold's 34.1 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 is a incredibly newer and much thinner phone than Nokia 6600 fold, although it is also much heavier. Google Pixel 4 features a very superior performance than Nokia 6600 fold, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Google Pixel 4 has a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 6600 fold, because it has a really bigger screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2280px resolution and a much higher pixel quantity per display inch. Google Pixel 4 counts with a way better camera than Nokia 6600 fold, because it has a much better resolution back camera and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Google Pixel 4 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 6600 fold, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better battery performance than Nokia 6600 fold, because it has a 226 percent larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 4 costs the same than Nokia 6600 fold.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.