Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.8 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2002-06-16 | 2006-04-04 |
| 4.17 x 1.77 x 0.69 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 2.96 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 75.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 757,76 KB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 220 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W315 is a little bit better than Nokia 6610, with a general score of 24.7 against 23.8. The Motorola W315 is a way newer phone than the Nokia 6610, although it's just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. The Motorola W315 features a little sharper display than Nokia 6610, because it has a quite better resolution of 160 x 128.
Motorola W315's processing unit is just as good as Nokia 6610's processor, both of them have a 0-Core processor. Nokia 6610 and Motorola W315 feature quite similar cameras. Nokia 6610 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola W315. The Motorola W315 counts with a way better battery performance than Nokia 6610.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola W315 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.