Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 31.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian 8.0 | -- |
| 2004-06-14 | 2008-09-02 |
| 4.33 x 2.36 x 0.81 inches | 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches |
| 4.47 ounces | 2.70 ounces |
| $ 269.00 | $ 150.00 |
| 176 x 208 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 10,24 MB internal memory | -- |
| RS-MMC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | -- |
| 4.51 | 3.63 |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 264 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 4.4 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
Samsung SPH-M320 has an overall score of 31.4, which is just a bit better than Nokia 6630's score of 28.6. Samsung SPH-M320's design is extremely newer, much lighter and thinner than the Nokia 6630. Samsung SPH-M320 has a screen that is very similar to Nokia 6630's screen, although the Samsung SPH-M320 has a way worse 160 x 128 resolution.
The Nokia 6630 has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung SPH-M320. Samsung SPH-M320's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Nokia 6630, both of them have the same number of cores. Samsung SPH-M320 counts with just a little better battery duration than Nokia 6630, because it has a 1000mAh battery capacity against 900mAh.
The Nokia 6630 takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung SPH-M320 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.