Search


Compare phones

Global Score
27.527.4
Basic Information
NokiaKyocera
2004-07-202006-04-05
5.24 x 2.04 x 1.02 inches3.50 x 1.80 x 1.00 inches
4.90 ounces4.00 ounces
$ 135.00$ 89.00
128 x 160 pixels 176 x 220 pixels
TFTTFT
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.93.1
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
6,14 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.20
Camera
0.30 MP1.30 MP
3.634.51
UMTS, GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.20.1
Battery Life
850mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
163 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.322.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 1.2
--GPS
Infra-red portInfra-red port
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia 6651 has an overall score of 27.5, which is a bit better than the Kyocera K822's 27.4 score. Even though the Nokia 6651 is better than Kyocera K822, we must highlight that it's also older, a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Kyocera K822 has a bit sharper screen than Nokia 6651, because it has a higher 220 x 176 resolution.

Kyocera K822 counts with a processor that is very similar to Nokia 6651's processing unit, both have the same number of cores. Kyocera K822 has a way better camera than Nokia 6651, because it has a lot more megapixels back camera. The Nokia 6651 has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Kyocera K822, although it has no external memory slot.

The Kyocera K822 counts with greater battery life than Nokia 6651, because it has an 18% more battery capacity.

Although Nokia 6651 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Kyocera K822, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Kyocera K822. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Nokia 6651, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Kyocera K822, letting go a couple features and specifications.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.