Search


Compare phones

Global Score
28.431.2
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
Symbian 7.0s--
2004-09-282005-11-08
4.27 x 2.08 x 0.82 inches3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches
4.16 ounces3.49 ounces
$ 135.00$ 90.00
176 x 208 pixels 176 x 220 pixels
TFTTFT
No touch screenNo touch screen
33
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
8,19 MB internal memory30,72 MB internal memory
RS-MMC external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.20.4
Camera
1.00 MP1.30 MP
4.294.51
GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.20.1
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery740mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
215 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
2.42.16
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 1.1
GPSGPS

Comparison review

Motorola RAZR V3c has a general score of 31.2, which is just a bit better than Nokia 6670's 28.4 general score. Motorola RAZR V3c is a newer cellphone, and it's also extremely thinner and somewhat lighter than Nokia 6670. Motorola RAZR V3c counts with a CPU that is very similar to the Nokia 6670 one, both have the same number of cores.

Motorola RAZR V3c counts with a screen that is very similar to the display in Nokia 6670, although the Motorola RAZR V3c also has a quite better 220 x 176px resolution. The Motorola RAZR V3c counts with just a bit better camera than Nokia 6670, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better 1.3 MP resolution.

Motorola RAZR V3c features a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Nokia 6670, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 22,53 MB more internal memory capacity. Nokia 6670 has improved battery duration than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a 22% greater battery size.

Motorola RAZR V3c is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.