Compare phones
Samsung Factor
M260| Global Score | |
| 32.4 | 35.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian 7.0 | -- |
| -- | 2011-03-09 |
| 4.64 x 2.04 x 0.70 inches | 3.80 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 3.20 ounces |
| -- | Gray |
| $ 90.00 | $ 79.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 208 x 320 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 191 pixels per inch | 102 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 18,43 MB internal memory | -- |
| SD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.3 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.51 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 275 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Factor is just a bit better than the Nokia 6708, with a 35.2 score against 32.4. The Samsung Factor is a incredibly lighter device than the Nokia 6708, but they have the same thickness. The Samsung Factor has a processing unit that is very similar to Nokia 6708's processor, both have 0 cores.
The Nokia 6708 has a better looking screen than Samsung Factor, because it has a lot better 320 x 208 resolution and a lot greater display density. The Nokia 6708 features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Factor. The Nokia 6708 captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Factor, because it has a way better resolution back camera.
The Samsung Factor counts with a way better battery duration than Nokia 6708.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Factor is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.