Search


Compare phones

Global Score
39.142.4
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
Symbian 9.3TouchWiz 2.0 UI
2009-02-162010-12-20
4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches4.44 x 2.19 x 0.50 inches
3.88 ounces3.32 ounces
$ 269.00$ 199.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches3 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive
6.56
ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor Single-Core 800 MHz processor
GPU GPU
6.757.02
Storage
46,08 MB internal memory138,24 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.41.7
Camera
5.00 MP3.00 MP
640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution
5.945.06
HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
1.10.1
Battery Life
1050mAh Li-Ion Battery1080mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
500 hours standby time
8.5 hours talk time
330 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.642.72
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPS--
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung Suede is just a bit better than Nokia 6720 classic, with a 42.4 score against 39.1. Samsung Suede is a newer phone, and it is also just a bit thinner and lighter than Nokia 6720 classic. Samsung Suede has TouchWiz 2.0 UI OS, while Nokia 6720 classic has Symbian 9.3 OS. Samsung Suede features a little faster CPU than Nokia 6720 classic. They have the same number of cores.

The Nokia 6720 classic features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Suede, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse 320 x 240 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount per screen inch. Samsung Suede has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 6720 classic, because it has 92,16 MB more internal storage capacity.

The Samsung Suede features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Nokia 6720 classic, because it has a 3% larger battery capacity. The Nokia 6720 classic shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Suede, because it has a way better 5 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot better 640x480 (VGA) video quality.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Suede is also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.