Compare phones
Kyocera Marbl
K132| Global Score | |
| 23.6 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Kyocera |
| 2002-11-18 | 2006-09-13 |
| 4.69 x 2.17 x 0.91 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.4 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Kyocera Marbl has a global score of 24.5, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 6800's 23.6 overall score. Kyocera Marbl's design is incredibly newer, a bit thinner and incredibly lighter than the Nokia 6800. Kyocera Marbl counts with a processor that is very similar to the Nokia 6800 one, both have the same number of cores.
Kyocera Marbl counts with a much sharper screen than Nokia 6800. They have exactly the same resolution of 128 x 128 pixels. Kyocera Marbl's camera is just as good as the Nokia 6800 one. The Kyocera Marbl has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Nokia 6800. The Nokia 6800 has a little better battery lifetime than Kyocera Marbl, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.
The Kyocera Marbl not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.