Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.6 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2002-11-18 | 2008-01-07 |
| 4.69 x 2.17 x 0.91 inches | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.48 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W270 is slightly better than the Nokia 6800, with a general score of 25.6 against 23.6. Motorola W270 is a notably newer phone, and it is also a lot lighter and notably thinner than the Nokia 6800. Motorola W270's processor is just as good as Nokia 6800's CPU, both of them have the same number of cores.
The Motorola W270 has a little bit better display than Nokia 6800. Both of them have the same 128 x 128 resolution. The Motorola W270's camera is very similar to the camera in Nokia 6800. The Motorola W270 counts with as much memory for games and applications as the Nokia 6800. Nokia 6800 features a bit superior battery performance than Motorola W270, because it has a 6 percent more battery size.
The Motorola W270 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.