Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.6 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2002-11-18 | 2006-04-04 |
| 4.69 x 2.17 x 0.91 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 75.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.32 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W315 has a general score of 24.7, which is a bit better than the Nokia 6800's general score of 23.6. Motorola W315 is a extremely newer phone, and it is also noticeably lighter and a little thinner than the Nokia 6800. Motorola W315 and Nokia 6800 feature very similar processors, they have a 0-Core CPU.
The Motorola W315 has a little sharper display than Nokia 6800, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 160 x 128. The Motorola W315 has as much storage for applications and games as the Nokia 6800 one. Nokia 6800 features improved battery life than Motorola W315, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.
The Nokia 6800 and the Motorola W315 both count with incredibly similar cameras.
The Motorola W315 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.