Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-30 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a bit better than the Nokia 7.2, with an 80.2 score against 75.9. Google Pixel's body is extremely lighter than the Nokia 7.2, although it's just a little thicker and was released 3 years before. Nokia 7.2 counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel features a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel amount per display inch. The Nokia 7.2 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Nokia 7.2 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Nokia 7.2 has improved battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh. The Nokia 7.2 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Nokia 7.2 also has a larger back camera sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.