Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-30 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Nokia 7.2, with an 87.1 score against 75.9. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way newer than the Nokia 7.2, it is just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. These devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Nokia 7.2 has Android 10.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better looking screen than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 7.2, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
The Nokia 7.2 has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with longer battery lifetime than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better camera than Nokia 7.2, because it has a camera with more megapixels, a way higher (4K) video quality, a larger aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.