Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-30 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Nokia 7.2's overall score of 75.9. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Nokia 7.2 has Android 10 version, offering lots of additional features. Galaxy S25 is a lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than the Nokia 7.2.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a better looking display than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount in each inch in the display. The Nokia 7.2 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Nokia 7.2 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Nokia 7.2 features a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes way better pictures and videos than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a much higher video resolution, a more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy S25 has a bit better battery performance than Nokia 7.2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.