Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-30 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the Nokia 7.2's overall score of 75.9. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is thinner and notably lighter than the Nokia 7.2. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Nokia 7.2 has Android 10 version, giving you lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
Nokia 7.2 has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Nokia 7.2, because it has a quite larger display, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Nokia 7.2 features just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior battery duration than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Nokia 7.2, because it has a way larger back camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.