Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-30 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Nokia 7.2, having a overall score of 80.1 against 75.9. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Nokia 7.2 has Android 10 version. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is heavier and way thicker than the Nokia 7.2.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Nokia 7.2, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better looking display than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Nokia 7.2 features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Nokia 7.2 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Nokia 7.2 has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Nokia 7.2 also counts with a camera with way more MP and a much bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with greater battery duration than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 29% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.